🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to resume atomic discussions with Washington as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared solely negotiations produced results, and revealed recent overtures had come from intermediaries to restart discussions with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet authorize the global atomic watchdog to access attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Course

The foreign minister is walking a challenging course since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be operating from a stance of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more resilient in military terms and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium within its borders that it will never give up" – the key factor of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Talks Suddenly Terminated

The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that concluded with the American leader asserting the locations had been obliterated. Afterward, Western states employed their privilege to restore international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iranian officials said they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that American atomic experts could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Representatives claimed three times they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the agreement to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Current Position

Iranian officials declared the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the proposal could be resurrected in certain ways if discussions resume.

The US president last week claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but in private Iran's diplomats say they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from America either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been charged of passivity in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his address to the gathering, intended to portray the US as a dominant force that abuses the notion of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the two-week conflict revealed the conflict could not be settled by combat operations. He said the assaults started with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with full US knowledge and cooperation, making trust hard to restore.

Dialogue Remains the Final Resolution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was the United States and the western countries that had always sought to enforce their desires during the discussions. Diplomacy can still be viable and stays the final solution to resolve disputes, but its requirements, guidelines and fundamentals must be respected."

"If they address to the Iranian people with the tone of respect and respect, they will receive a reply in the equivalent language."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We gained many lessons from this war; we have identified our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He added: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to destroy, continues to exist. The installations and machinery, if damaged, will be restored; what is crucial is the determination of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have become more resilient, more cohesive, and more backing of the government and the country in the aftermath of this attack."